The choice between a colocation service (placing your own equipment in a data center) and virtual server rental (in our case VPS/VDS) is an important stage in the development of any company's IT infrastructure. The level of control, costs, flexibility and compliance with regulatory requirements depend on this decision.
In this article, we will consider the main characteristics of both options, highlight the advantages and disadvantages, and provide a comparison table to make your choice easier.
What is colocation?
Colocation is a service of placing your own physical server in a professional data center. The client independently purchases the equipment, delivers it to the data center, where it is connected to the infrastructure: power supply, cooling system and communication channel.
All maintenance, component updates and administration remain on the customer's side. Responsibility for security and compliance also lies with the customer.
Advantages of colocation:
- Full control over equipment.
- Increased security (only authorized employees have physical access).
- Ability to strictly comply with regulatory requirements (e.g. GDPR, DPA).
- Independence from provider policies.
- Possibility of installing specific hardware.
Disadvantages of colocation:
- The need to purchase a server.
- The need to purchase and maintain equipment.
- Limited scalability - each upgrade requires physical intervention and “rack access”.
- Additional costs for logistics and maintenance.
What is virtual server rental (VPS / VDS)?
VPS (Virtual Private Server) is an isolated virtual environment on the provider's physical server. The user gets access to dedicated resources: CPU, RAM, disk, operating system. Configuration is carried out remotely through the control panel or SSH access.
Advantages of renting a VPS:
- There is no need to buy a server.
- Low cost compared to colocation.
- Quick start: the server is activated within a few minutes.
- High flexibility and scalability.
- There is no need to purchase and maintain physical equipment.
- Possibility to choose OS, configuration, tariff.
Disadvantages of renting a VPS:
- The level of security depends on the integrity of the provider.
- There is no possibility to install specific equipment or radically increase productivity.
Comparison table: colocation and VPS
| Parameter | Colocation | VPS/VDS |
|---|---|---|
| Equipment control | Complete, including selection of components and BIOS | Not required |
| Start-up costs | High (purchase of equipment) | Minimum (monthly subscription) |
| Flexibility and scalability | Limited, requires physical access | High, via control panel |
| Speed of deployment | About a week | A few minutes |
| Physical Maintenance / Upgrade | Required | Not required |
| Security level | High, with qualified personnel | Average, depends on the provider |
| Regulatory compliance (GDPR, DPA) | Provided by the client | Depends on the level of the data center and the provider's policy |
| Suitable for projects with sensitive data | Yes | Yes, with high trust in the provider |
Comparing Costs and Features: Colocation and Virtual Server Rental
When choosing an infrastructure for hosting servers, companies often face the need to choose between hosting their own equipment in a data center (colocation service) and renting a virtual server (VPS). Below we will consider two options using the example of the Ukrainian data center Volya and the virtual server provider SIDATA, and we will also conduct a comparative analysis of key parameters.
Server conditions in a rack (colocation) in the Volya data center
| Equipment form factor | Power supply parameters | Monthly cost (UAH) |
|---|---|---|
| Rackmount up to 2 units | up to 350W | 2500 |
| Rackmount up to 4 units | up to 600W | 4400 |
| Tower (up to 220×444×550 mm) | up to 600W | 4600 |
Additional services such as remote hands, upgrades, maintenance, component replacement, backup are usually paid for separately.
Also, don't forget about the cost of the server itself. Let's take an average server costing 45,000 ₴.
VPS rental conditions from SIDATA (Europe, Intel platform)
| Tariff plan | CPU | RAM | Disk | Channel | OS | Backups | Monthly cost, UAH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDIUM | 4 Cores AMD 3.5 GHz | 8 GB | 120GB NVMe | 1000 Mbps | Win/Linux | 7 days | 1600 |
| PROF | 5 Cores AMD 3.5 GHz | 10 GB | 140GB NVMe | 1000 Mbps | Win/Linux | 7 days | 1800 |
| PROF+ | 6 Cores AMD 3.5 GHz | 12 GB | 160GB NVMe | 1000 Mbps | Win/Linux | 7 days | 2050 |
| XL | 7 Cores AMD 3.5 GHz | 16 GB | 200GB NVMe | 1000 Mbps | Win/Linux | 7 days | 2400 |
Additionally, the price includes:
- All plans include a free 5-day trial period.
- The price includes 24/7 support.
- Placement in European data centers of Tier III level and above.
Comparison table: Colocation from Volya vs VPS rental from SIDATA
Example: placement of 2U server (up to 350W)
| Parameter | Colocation in Volya | VPS SIDATA (XL tariff) |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | 2500 UAH | 2400 UAH |
| Accommodation type | Physical (Kyiv) | Virtual (Europe) |
| Hardware specifications | Depends on the customer's equipment | 7 AND cores, 16GB RAM, 200GB NVMe |
| Channel capacity | Depends on connection | 1000 Mbps |
| Responsibility for maintenance | On the client side | On the provider side |
| Backup | The client organizes it independently | Included in the tariff (7-day backup) |
| Support | Limited, paid | Included in the tariff |
| Availability (uptime) | Depends on data center conditions | Data center SLA guaranteed |
| Scalability | Requires physical intervention | Flexible, via control panel |
| Start of operation | Requires delivery and installation | Instantly (up to 15 minutes) |
As we can see, both colocation and renting a ready-made virtual server cost almost the same, yes, it is not a dedicated server, but considering the starting costs for a similar server plus or minus 45,000 ₴. It turns out to be more profitable to take a ready-made virtual server in the cloud than to pay for colocation and buy an expensive server and, in case of increased load, simply change the tariff to a higher one than to bother with buying, installing, servicing equipment in a rack.
Let's sum it up
Colocation is suitable for companies that already have equipment and a team ready to service the infrastructure. This approach may be justified if there are specific requirements for the hardware, a high degree of customization, or a policy of using only their own equipment.
Renting a virtual server from SIDATA offers a flexible, less expensive and faster solution. Within one tariff, the client receives a full set of services - from hardware resources to maintenance and data backup. Considering the level of cost and additional services, renting a VPS is a preferred solution for most typical tasks of small and medium businesses, especially in conditions of the need for remote access and high availability.
Both options have a right to exist and are used depending on the business objectives. Colocation is preferable for companies seeking maximum control, security and compliance. This solution is suitable for mature organizations with their own IT department and long-term planning.
Renting a VPS will be optimal for fast-growing projects that value flexibility, launch speed, and minimal initial costs. This is an approach with a minimal infrastructure load, allowing you to focus on business, not technical details.
Just contact us and we will help you choose the best solution for you.


